English-Speaking Lawyers in Korea

Korean and U.S.-licensed attorneys ·
Busan & California

Jin & Kim, PLC | Legal Blog

This is the official blog of Jin & Kim, PLC, an international law firm with Korean and U.S.-licensed attorneys in Busan and California, advising foreign companies and individuals on legal matters throughout Korea and Korea-related international matters.

In addition to our firm website, we maintain this blog to share practical, up-to-date legal information and to offer a faster way to reach our attorneys.

For legal assistance, please submit your inquiry using this blog’s contact form or message us directly on . We will get back to you promptly, usually within the same business day.

Family

Can Korean Courts Freeze Assets Before a Divorce Is Final?

Jin & Kim, PLC 2025. 11. 17. 15:50

Short Answer

Yes. Before a divorce is finalized, a spouse may, in appropriate circumstances, ask a Korean court to issue provisional measures to preserve assets. In practice, this usually involves seeking a Provisional Attachment (가압류) or a Preliminary Injunction (가처분) over specified assets or legal rights.

The term "freeze assets" is often used in everyday language, but Korean law does not impose a blanket freeze over all of a spouse's property. Instead, the court determines whether particular assets or claims should be preserved until the divorce and related financial issues have been resolved.

Where there is a genuine risk that marital assets may be transferred, concealed, or dissipated before judgment, prompt legal action can play an important role in protecting a spouse's financial interests.


What Does Korean Law Provide?

Under the Family Litigation Act, Korean Family Courts may grant Provisional Attachments (가압류) and Preliminary Injunctions (가처분) in connection with pending family law proceedings.

Although both are provisional remedies, they serve different purposes.

A Provisional Attachment is generally used to preserve monetary claims, including claims that may ultimately result in a monetary award after the divorce.

A Preliminary Injunction is generally used to preserve specific property or legal rights, such as preventing the transfer or disposal of particular real estate or other identifiable assets.

These remedies are temporary measures. They do not determine ownership, property division, or the parties' substantive rights. Instead, they are designed to preserve the effectiveness of a future judgment while the divorce proceedings remain pending.

Whether provisional relief will be granted depends on the specific facts of the case and whether the applicant demonstrates both a prima facie legal claim and the need for urgent preservation.


How Does It Work in Practice?

Asset preservation frequently becomes important where one spouse appears to be reducing the value of the marital estate before the Family Court can determine property division.

Common situations include:

  • Selling real estate below market value.
  • Transferring funds to relatives or third parties.
  • Making unusually large cash withdrawals.
  • Moving assets to overseas accounts.
  • Selling company shares or business interests.
  • Transferring cryptocurrency or digital assets.
  • Creating artificial debts to reduce apparent net worth.

In these circumstances, delaying legal action may significantly reduce the assets ultimately available for division.

It is also important to understand that the appropriate provisional remedy depends on what is being preserved.

Where the objective is to secure a potential monetary claim, a Provisional Attachment is generally the appropriate remedy.

Where the concern is that a particular asset—such as real estate or shares—may be transferred or otherwise disposed of, a Preliminary Injunction may be more appropriate.

These remedies preserve the status quo while the court determines the parties' substantive rights. They do not finally resolve who owns the property or how it should ultimately be divided.

In international divorce cases, assets located outside Korea may require additional preservation measures under the law of the country where those assets are situated.


What Evidence Is Usually Required?

An applicant generally bears the burden of demonstrating both the legal basis of the claim and the need for provisional protection.

Depending on the circumstances, useful evidence may include:

  • Real estate registration records.
  • Bank account information.
  • Corporate registration documents.
  • Shareholder records.
  • Cryptocurrency transaction records.
  • Financial statements.
  • Property purchase agreements.
  • Emails, text messages, or other communications indicating an intention to transfer or conceal assets.

Evidence showing recent or unusual transactions is often particularly important in demonstrating the need for urgent preservation.


What Should Foreign Clients Know?

International divorce cases frequently involve assets located in multiple jurisdictions.

Foreign clients should consider the following:

  • Identify significant assets as early as possible.
  • Collect financial records before assets disappear.
  • Determine whether the relevant assets are located inside or outside Korea.
  • Preserve evidence of suspicious transfers or unusual financial activity.
  • Review whether separate preservation proceedings may also be necessary in another country.
  • Consult Korean counsel before notifying the other spouse where there is a genuine risk of asset dissipation.

In some cases, timing is as important as the evidence itself. Waiting until assets have already been transferred may substantially reduce the effectiveness of any future court order.


Conclusion

Korean courts may grant Provisional Attachments or Preliminary Injunctions before a divorce is finalized where the legal requirements are satisfied. These remedies are designed to preserve specified assets or legal rights, rather than imposing a blanket freeze over all of a spouse's property.

Where a divorce involves substantial marital assets, family businesses, cryptocurrency, or overseas property, early legal planning and strategic evidence gathering can significantly improve the likelihood that sufficient assets remain available when the Family Court ultimately determines property division.


Need advice on your situation?

Speak with our attorneys by submitting your inquiry through this blog’s contact form or messaging us directly on . We will get back to you promptly, usually within the same business day.

Contact Jin & Kim
Prefer to chat? WhatsApp